DAO Employment vs. Contributor Classification: IRS & Labor Law Guide

Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) face a critical classification challenge: when does a contributor become an employee under tax and labor law? The stakes are substantial—misclassifying even one employee as an independent contractor can trigger IRS penalties ranging from $50 to $1,000 per unfiled form, plus back payroll taxes, interest, and potential state labor law violations.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for DAOs to navigate contributor classification, covering IRS tests, token compensation taxation, foreign contributor reporting, and practical compliance strategies.

Why Classification Matters: The Real Costs

Before diving into classification tests, DAOs need to understand the financial implications of getting this wrong.

Tax Obligations for Employees vs. Contractors

Independent Contractors (1099):

• No payroll tax withholding required
• No unemployment insurance
• No workers' compensation insurance
• Issue Form 1099-NEC if paid $600+ annually
• Contractor pays self-employment tax (15.3%)

Employees (W-2):

• Employer pays 7.65% FICA (Social Security and Medicare)
• Withhold employee's 7.65% FICA from wages
• Pay federal unemployment tax (FUTA): 0.6% on first $7,000 (with credit)
• Pay state unemployment insurance (rates vary by state)
• Withhold federal and state income taxes
• Potentially provide benefits if 50+ full-time employees
• Workers' compensation insurance required in most states

For a DAO paying $100,000 annually to a contributor:

• As contractor: Zero payroll tax obligation
• As employee: $7,650 in employer FICA taxes, plus FUTA (~$42), state unemployment (varies), and administrative compliance costs

Multiply this across multiple contributors, and misclassification becomes a six-figure liability.

Misclassification Penalties: A Costly Mistake

Unintentional Misclassification:

• $50 per unfiled Form W-2 (can reach $280 per form if intentional disregard)
• 1.5% of wages in back taxes
• 40% of employee's unpaid FICA taxes
• 100% of employer's share of unpaid FICA taxes
• Interest accruing from original due date
• Failure-to-pay penalty: 0.5% per month, up to 25%

Intentional or Fraudulent Misclassification:

• 20% of wages paid
• 100% of both employer and employee FICA taxes
• Criminal penalties up to $1,000 per misclassified worker
• Potential imprisonment for willful violations

State-Level Penalties:

• Back payment of state unemployment insurance
• State income tax withholding deficiencies
• Labor law violations (meal breaks, overtime, etc.)
• Workers' compensation insurance gaps

Example: A DAO with 5 misclassified contributors earning $80,000 each faces:

• $30,600 in employer FICA alone (7.65% × $400,000)
• $250+ in W-2 filing penalties
• Back state unemployment taxes
• Interest and late payment penalties
• Potential DOL investigation

The IRS Voluntary Classification Settlement Program (VCSP) offers relief—employers pay just 10% of the employment tax liability for the most recent year, skip interest and penalties, and avoid audits for prior years. But this requires voluntary compliance before the IRS discovers the issue.

The IRS Common Law Test: Federal Classification Standard

The IRS applies common law principles to determine worker classification, examining three categories of evidence: behavioral control, financial control, and the relationship between parties. No single factor is determinative—the IRS evaluates the entire relationship.

Behavioral Control

Does the DAO control or have the right to control what work is accomplished and how?

Indicators of Employee Status:

• DAO provides detailed instructions on how to complete tasks
• DAO mandates specific work hours or schedules
• DAO requires attendance at regular meetings or check-ins
• DAO provides training on protocols, tools, or methodologies
• DAO evaluates how work is performed, not just results
• DAO has approval rights over work methods

Indicators of Contractor Status:

• Contributor determines own methods and processes
• DAO focuses solely on deliverables and outcomes
• Contributor sets own schedule and location
• No DAO-provided training required
• Contributor brings own expertise and methodology

DAO Example: A governance contributor who must attend weekly DAO calls, follow specific proposal formatting requirements, and receive training on governance tools likely exhibits behavioral control indicators of employment. By contrast, a contributor hired to write a specific smart contract deliverable, using their own development methods and timeline, appears more contractor-like.

Financial Control

Does the DAO control the business aspects of the contributor's work?

Indicators of Employee Status:

• DAO provides all necessary tools, software, and equipment
• DAO reimburses business expenses
• Contributor is paid hourly or salary (guaranteed payment)
• No opportunity for profit or loss beyond salary
• Contributor cannot offer services to other DAOs simultaneously
• Investment in the work comes from the DAO, not contributor

Indicators of Contractor Status:

• Contributor uses own equipment and tools
• Contributor bears own business expenses
• Payment is project-based or milestone-driven
• Contributor can profit by working efficiently or take loss if project takes longer
• Contributor actively markets services to multiple clients
• Contributor has unreimbursed business investments (software licenses, equipment)

DAO Example: A community manager receiving a monthly token allocation, using DAO-provided social media accounts and tools, with reimbursed advertising expenses, exhibits financial control indicators of employment. A smart contract auditor who uses their own tools, charges per audit, and serves multiple protocol clients appears more contractor-like.

Relationship of the Parties

How do the parties perceive their relationship?

Indicators of Employee Status:

• Written agreement describes an employment relationship
• DAO provides employee-type benefits (health insurance, retirement)
• Relationship is ongoing and indefinite
• Work performed is a key aspect of DAO's regular operations
• Contributor works exclusively for the DAO
• Discharge or resignation practices similar to employment

Indicators of Contractor Status:

• Written independent contractor agreement
• No benefits provided beyond payment for services
• Relationship is project-based with defined end date
• Work is supplemental to DAO's core operations
• Contributor maintains multiple client relationships
• Contract can be terminated upon project completion

DAO Example: A core team member with a multi-year token vesting schedule, participating in all strategic decisions, with work integral to the DAO's protocol development, likely falls into employee status. A contributor engaged for a specific 3-month tokenomics redesign project, working with several other protocols, appears more contractor-like.

Applying the Test: Weight All Factors

The IRS emphasizes that no single factor is controlling. A DAO must evaluate the totality of the relationship. A contributor might exhibit some employee factors (regular payment schedule) and some contractor factors (uses own equipment). The classification depends on which factors predominate.

Key IRS Principle: "If the company can control what will be done and how it will be done, then the worker is an employee."

State-Level Classification: The Stricter ABC Test

While federal tax law uses the common law test, many states—most notably California—apply the more restrictive ABC test for state employment law purposes (wage and hour, unemployment insurance, workers' compensation).

The California ABC Test (Dynamex Standard)

Under California's ABC test, adopted in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court (2018) and codified in AB 5, a worker is presumed to be an employee unless the hiring entity proves all three conditions:

Prong A: Freedom from Control The worker is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract and in fact.

Prong B: Outside Usual Course of Business The worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity's business.

Prong C: Independently Established Trade The worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed.

Why Prong B Is Killer for DAOs

Prong B creates the greatest challenge for DAOs. If a contributor performs work that is part of the DAO's core operations, they fail this test regardless of how independently they work.

Examples:

• Core developer for DeFi protocol: Writing smart contracts is the protocol's usual course of business → Likely employee under ABC test
• Marketing specialist for NFT project: Marketing is integral to the project's operations → Likely employee under ABC test
• External smart contract auditor: Auditing is not part of the protocol's usual business (the protocol doesn't provide audits as a service) → Potentially contractor under ABC test
• Specialized tokenomics consultant: One-off advisory work outside the DAO's regular operations → Potentially contractor under ABC test

Critical Takeaway: Many DAO contributors who would qualify as independent contractors under the IRS test will be classified as employees under California's ABC test if they perform work integral to the DAO's operations.

Other State Standards

California isn't alone in using stricter tests:

• Massachusetts, New Jersey: Also apply ABC test
• New York, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Nebraska, Connecticut: Use "convenience of the employer" rule—tax residents even if working remotely from another state
• 17 states + D.C.: Have reciprocity agreements affecting multi-state tax withholding

Multi-State Compliance: DAOs with contributors in multiple states must comply with each state's classification test and withholding requirements. This can create conflicting obligations—a contributor may be an independent contractor federally but an employee in California.

Token Compensation: Tax Treatment Under IRC § 83

Token grants add complexity to DAO contributor taxation. The IRS treats tokens as property subject to Internal Revenue Code Section 83, which governs property transferred for services.

When Are Tokens Taxable?

General Rule: Tokens are taxable as ordinary income when they vest (when substantial risk of forfeiture lapses).

Vesting Defined: Tokens vest when the contributor has an unrestricted right to them. Common vesting triggers:

• Time-based vesting (tokens unlock after 6 months, 1 year, etc.)
• Performance-based vesting (milestones achieved)
• Combination vesting (time + performance)

Tax Amount: Fair market value of tokens on vesting date, minus any amount the contributor paid for them.

Restricted Token Units (RTUs) vs. Liquid Token Grants

Liquid Tokens (No Restrictions):

• Taxable immediately upon receipt
• Ordinary income = FMV on receipt date
• DAO has withholding obligation if contributor is employee
• Contributor receives W-2 (employee) or 1099-NEC (contractor)

Restricted Tokens (Vesting Schedule):

• Not taxable until vesting occurs
• Ordinary income = FMV on vesting date
• DAO has withholding obligation on each vesting event if contributor is employee
• Contributor can make 83(b) election (see below)

Example: DAO grants contributor 10,000 tokens worth $5 each on grant date, vesting over 2 years (50% each year).

Without 83(b) election:

• Year 1 vesting: 5,000 tokens vest. If tokens now worth $8 each → $40,000 ordinary income
• Year 2 vesting: 5,000 tokens vest. If tokens now worth $12 each → $60,000 ordinary income
• Total ordinary income: $100,000

With 83(b) election (see below):

• Income recognized on grant: 10,000 tokens × $5 = $50,000 ordinary income
• No additional income on vesting dates
• Total ordinary income: $50,000

The IRC § 83(b) Election: A Critical Tax Strategy

The 83(b) election allows contributors to elect to recognize income on the grant date (based on current FMV) rather than waiting for vesting.

Benefits:

• Lock in taxation at current (potentially lower) valuation
• Future appreciation is capital gain, not ordinary income
• Avoid income tax surprises if token price spikes before vesting

Risks:

• Pay tax upfront on unvested tokens
• If tokens decline in value or contributor leaves before vesting, taxes paid are not refundable
• If contributor never receives the tokens, no tax benefit

Critical Deadline: Must file 83(b) election with IRS within 30 days of grant. Missing this deadline means the election is permanently lost.

Tax Withholding Complication: If the contributor is an employee and files an 83(b) election, the DAO has an immediate withholding obligation on the full grant value—even though the tokens haven't vested. This creates cash flow challenges, especially if the DAO pays in tokens but must withhold cash for taxes.

Practical Solutions for Token Withholding

Challenge: Employee receives 10,000 tokens worth $50,000 with 83(b) election filed. DAO owes ~$15,000 in withholding (FICA + estimated income tax), but has no cash to remit.

Solutions:

1. Sell-to-Cover: DAO sells portion of contributor's tokens to cover withholding

   • Employee receives net tokens after tax withholding
   • Requires liquid market and contributor consent
   • Creates additional tax reporting complexity

2. Contributor Pays Cash: Employee provides cash to cover withholding

   • DAO remits employee's cash to IRS
   • Preserves full token allocation for employee
   • Requires employee to have cash available

3. Gross-Up: DAO grants additional tokens to cover tax liability

   • Complicated calculation (gross-up itself is taxable)
   • Expensive for DAO
   • Common in traditional equity compensation

4. Contractor Classification: Structure relationship as independent contractor

   • No withholding obligation
   • Contributor responsible for own taxes
   • Only viable if relationship genuinely meets contractor tests

Most DAOs choose option 4 (contractor structure) to avoid withholding complexity, but this creates misclassification risk if the relationship actually meets employment tests.

Foreign Contributor Compliance: W-8BEN and Reporting

DAOs frequently engage contributors outside the United States, creating distinct reporting obligations.

W-8BEN Requirement

Form W-8BEN (individuals) or W-8BEN-E (entities): Foreign contributors must complete these forms to:

• Certify foreign status
• Claim tax treaty benefits (if applicable)
• Establish exemption from U.S. withholding

DAO Obligations:

• Provide W-8BEN to foreign contributors before payment
• Retain completed W-8BEN on file (not filed with IRS)
• Use W-8BEN to determine whether withholding or reporting applies

Key Point: W-8BEN does NOT eliminate reporting—it determines which forms apply.

When to Issue Form 1099 to Foreign Contributors

General Rule: No Form 1099 required if:

• Contributor is foreign person (confirmed via W-8BEN), AND
• Services performed entirely outside the United States

Exception—1099 Required: If foreign contractor performed services within the U.S., DAO must issue Form 1099-NEC.

Exception—Form 1042-S Required: If DAO pays foreign contractor for U.S.-sourced income (services performed in U.S.), file Form 1042-S instead of 1099-NEC.

U.S. Withholding on Foreign Contractors

30% Withholding Rule: Payments to foreign contractors for U.S.-sourced services are generally subject to 30% withholding unless:

• Tax treaty reduces rate (W-8BEN claims treaty benefit)
• Services are not U.S.-sourced (performed entirely outside U.S.)
• Payment is effectively connected income (ECI)

DAO Action: Determine where services are performed. Remote work from contributor's home country generally = no U.S. sourcing = no withholding. But DAO must document this.

Foreign Contributor Checklist

• Obtain completed W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E before first payment
• Verify services will be performed outside the U.S.
• Document location of services in contractor agreement
• Determine if tax treaty applies (check W-8BEN Part II)
• If U.S. services: withhold 30% (or treaty rate) and file Form 1042-S
• If non-U.S. services: no withholding, no 1099, retain W-8BEN
• Review W-8BEN validity every 3 years

Employee Benefits Requirements: When Does a DAO Need to Provide Benefits?

If a DAO classifies contributors as employees, benefit obligations may be triggered depending on DAO size and structure.

Affordable Care Act (ACA) Requirements

Threshold: 50 or more full-time equivalent employees (FTEs)

Obligations if threshold met:

• Offer health insurance to 95% of full-time employees (and their dependents up to age 26)
• Coverage must be "affordable" (employee premium ≤ 9.12% of household income for 2025)
• Coverage must provide "minimum value" (covers ≥ 60% of costs)
• Failure to comply: $2,970 per full-time employee (2025 rate)

Small DAOs (under 50 FTEs):

• No ACA mandate to provide coverage
• If coverage offered voluntarily, must comply with ACA consumer protections (essential health benefits, no annual/lifetime limits)
• May qualify for Small Business Health Care Tax Credit if <25 FTEs

DAO Reality Check: Most DAOs are unlikely to reach 50 FTE threshold, but token vesting schedules and governance participation can create arguable employment relationships that aggregate toward the limit.

Other Employee Benefits

Workers' Compensation Insurance:

• Required in most states for employees
• Coverage for work-related injuries
• Penalties for non-compliance: fines, criminal charges, personal liability for injuries

Unemployment Insurance:

• Employer must pay state unemployment insurance for employees
• Rates vary by state and experience rating
• Federal unemployment (FUTA): 0.6% on first $7,000 per employee (with state credit)

State-Specific Requirements:

• Paid Family Leave (8 states): Colorado, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington require employer contributions
• Temporary Disability Insurance (5 states): California, Hawaii, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island require employee wage deductions for TDI

Practical Implication: Employee classification triggers cascading obligations beyond payroll taxes. DAOs must budget for insurance, benefits administration, and state-specific programs.

Decision Framework: Employee or Contractor?

Use this framework to classify DAO contributors:

Step 1: Apply IRS Common Law Test

Evaluate behavioral control, financial control, and relationship factors:

• Does DAO control how work is performed (not just results)?
• Does DAO provide tools, equipment, training?
• Is payment guaranteed (salary/hourly) vs. project-based?
• Is relationship ongoing vs. fixed-term project?
• Is contributor's work integral to DAO operations?
• Does contributor work exclusively for DAO?

Result: If majority of factors point to employee, classify as employee for federal tax purposes.

Step 2: Apply State-Specific Test (if applicable)

If contributor is in California, Massachusetts, or New Jersey, apply ABC test:

• Prong A: Is contributor free from DAO control in how work is performed?
• Prong B: Is work outside DAO's usual course of business?
• Prong C: Is contributor engaged in independently established trade?

Result: DAO must satisfy ALL THREE prongs for contractor classification under state law.

Critical: A contributor may be contractor federally but employee under state law. When in conflict, comply with the stricter standard to avoid state penalties.

Step 3: Document the Analysis

IRS and state agencies expect documented classification decisions:

• List all factors considered
• Explain weight given to each factor
• Describe why overall relationship supports classification
• Attach written agreement (contractor or employment)
• Review classification annually or when relationship changes

Best Practice: Use Form SS-8 (Determination of Worker Status) to request IRS determination if classification is unclear. This provides certainty but may trigger closer scrutiny.

Step 4: Structure Accordingly

If Contractor:

• Written independent contractor agreement
• Contributor invoices for services
• Contributor uses own equipment/tools
• No DAO control over methods
• Project-based or milestone payments
• Issue Form 1099-NEC (if U.S.) or obtain W-8BEN (if foreign)
• No withholding, no benefits

If Employee:

• Written employment agreement or offer letter
• Set regular compensation (salary or hourly)
• Withhold payroll taxes (FICA, federal, state)
• Provide W-2 annually
• Pay employer share of FICA, FUTA, state unemployment
• Evaluate benefits obligations (if 50+ FTEs)
• Workers' compensation insurance
• Comply with state wage/hour laws (meal breaks, overtime, etc.)

DAO Compensation Models: Real-World Examples

Different DAO structures create different classification outcomes:

Model 1: Core Team with Token Vesting (Likely Employees)

Structure:

• 5 core contributors
• Monthly stablecoin salary + 4-year token vesting
• Daily coordination via Discord
• Use DAO-provided tools and accounts
• Work is developing and maintaining protocol (DAO's core business)

Classification Analysis:

• Behavioral control: Daily coordination, DAO directs what work is done
• Financial control: Regular salary, DAO provides tools
• Relationship: Ongoing, integral to DAO operations
• ABC Test (Prong B): Work IS usual course of DAO business → Employee

Result: Likely employees under both IRS and state tests

Compliance Requirements:

• Payroll tax withholding on stablecoin salary
• Determine vesting taxation (immediate or 83(b) election)
• Withholding on token vesting events
• W-2 reporting
• Consider benefits if approaching 50 FTEs

Model 2: Project-Based Contributors (Likely Contractors)

Structure:

• DAO hires smart contract auditor for protocol v2 review
• Fixed-price audit: 100,000 USDC + 5,000 governance tokens
• Auditor uses own tools and methodology
• 6-week engagement, defined deliverable
• Auditor serves multiple protocols

Classification Analysis:

• Behavioral control: DAO specifies desired outcome, not methods
• Financial control: Auditor uses own tools, fixed project fee
• Relationship: Fixed-term, specific deliverable
• ABC Test (Prong B): Auditing not DAO's usual business (DAO doesn't provide audits as a service) → Contractor

Result: Likely independent contractor

Compliance Requirements:

• Form 1099-NEC (if U.S. auditor paid $600+)
• W-8BEN (if foreign auditor, services performed outside U.S.)
• No payroll tax withholding
• Governance tokens: auditor reports as ordinary income on receipt

Model 3: Hybrid Contributor (Classification Risk)

Structure:

• Community manager
• Part-time (20 hrs/week), ongoing relationship
• Paid monthly in governance tokens
• Uses own computer but DAO provides social media accounts
• Sets own hours but must attend weekly team call
• Also manages community for two other DAOs

Classification Analysis:

• Mixed factors: Some employee indicators (ongoing, team calls, DAO accounts), some contractor (part-time, serves other DAOs, sets hours)
• ABC Test (Prong B): Community management IS usual course of DAO business → Employee under ABC
• Key risk: Regular ongoing relationship + integral work = employee

Result: Borderline case with employee classification risk, especially in California

Recommended Approach:

• If truly contractor: emphasize project-based milestones, no attendance requirements, contributor provides all tools
• If employee: formalize employment, process payroll, withhold taxes
• Document decision rationale thoroughly

Model 4: DAO LLC with Formal Structure (Clear Employment)

Structure:

• DAO forms Wyoming DAO LLC
• Hires 10 W-2 employees
• Formal employment agreements
• Payroll processed through DAO's US bank account
• Health insurance offered to full-time employees

Classification Analysis:

• Formal employment structure
• Traditional employer-employee relationship
• No classification ambiguity

Compliance Requirements:

• Full payroll tax withholding and remittance
• W-2 reporting
• Federal and state unemployment insurance
• Workers' compensation insurance
• ACA compliance not yet triggered (under 50 FTEs)
• State-specific benefits (PFML, TDI if applicable)

Compliance Checklist: W-2 vs. 1099 Requirements

For Each Contributor, Determine:

Classification Decision:

• Applied IRS common law test
• Applied state-specific test (if CA, MA, NJ, etc.)
• Documented factors and decision rationale
• Resolved any federal/state classification conflicts

If Independent Contractor (1099):

U.S. Contractors:

• Obtain Form W-9 before first payment
• Maintain independent contractor agreement
• Track total payments (threshold: $600 for Form 1099-NEC)
• Issue Form 1099-NEC by January 31
• File Copy A with IRS by January 31 (paper) or March 31 (electronic)
• Avoid control indicators (set hours, provide training, control methods)

Foreign Contractors:

• Obtain Form W-8BEN (individuals) or W-8BEN-E (entities)
• Verify services performed outside U.S. (document in agreement)
• Determine if tax treaty applies
• If U.S. services: withhold 30% (or treaty rate) and file Form 1042-S
• If non-U.S. services: no withholding, no Form 1099, retain W-8BEN
• Revalidate W-8BEN every 3 years

Token Payments:

• Determine FMV on payment date
• Report token value on Form 1099-NEC (for U.S. contractors)
• Issue 1099-NEC even if paid entirely in tokens

If Employee (W-2):

Payroll Setup:

• Obtain Form W-4 (federal withholding) and state equivalent
• Calculate gross wages (cash + FMV of tokens on vesting/payment)
• Withhold employee FICA (7.65%)
• Withhold federal income tax per W-4
• Withhold state income tax
• Withhold state-specific deductions (TDI, PFML if applicable)
• Pay employer FICA (7.65%)
• Remit withheld taxes per IRS deposit schedule

Quarterly/Annual Reporting:

• File Form 941 (quarterly federal tax return)
• Pay and file FUTA (Form 940 annually)
• File state unemployment returns (quarterly)
• Issue Form W-2 by January 31
• File Copy A with SSA by January 31 (paper) or March 31 (electronic)
• File state W-2s per state deadlines

Token Compensation Specifics:

• Determine vesting schedule
• Calculate FMV on each vesting date
• Withhold taxes on vesting events (cash or sell-to-cover)
• If employee files 83(b): withhold on grant date FMV
• Report token value in Box 1 (wages) on W-2
• Report withholding in applicable boxes

Benefits and Insurance:

• Obtain workers' compensation insurance
• If 50+ FTEs: evaluate ACA requirements
• Comply with state-specific benefit mandates
• Track hours for overtime eligibility (if non-exempt)
• Provide required meal/rest breaks per state law

Multi-State Considerations:

• Register with each state where employees work
• Determine state income tax withholding (work state vs. residence state)
• Check reciprocity agreements
• Comply with "convenience of employer" states (NY, PA, NE, CT, DE)
• File non-resident withholding returns where required

Record Retention:

• Keep classification analysis documentation (4 years minimum)
• Retain Forms W-9, W-8BEN, W-4 (duration of relationship + 4 years)
• Keep copies of all 1099s and W-2s (4 years)
• Maintain payroll records (3 years minimum, longer in some states)
• Document token FMV calculations and sources

Safe Harbor Strategies: Reducing Classification Risk

DAOs can minimize misclassification exposure through intentional structural choices:

Strategy 1: Genuine Contractor Relationships

Design contributor relationships to satisfy contractor tests:

Structural Elements:

• Fixed-term project agreements (3 months, 6 months, defined milestone)
• Deliverable-based rather than time-based compensation
• Contributor provides all tools, software, equipment
• No DAO-provided training or onboarding beyond project scope
• Contributor serves multiple DAOs/clients (document this)
• No attendance requirements (meetings, calls, standups)
• Focus on outcomes, not methods or processes

Documentation:

• Independent contractor agreement specifying relationship
• Statement of work detailing specific deliverables
• Invoice process (contributor bills DAO, not payroll)
• No employee-style policies (vacation, sick leave, benefits)

Strategy 2: Service Provider Entities

Instead of engaging individual contractors, contract with service provider companies:

Structure:

• Contributor forms LLC or corporation
• DAO contracts with entity, not individual
• Entity invoices DAO for services
• Individual is employee of their own entity

Benefits:

• Clearer contractor relationship (B2B service agreement)
• Entity handles its own employment tax obligations
• Reduced DAO misclassification risk

Limitations:

• Doesn't eliminate scrutiny if entity is single-person LLC doing employee-like work
• State laws (like California ABC test) can look through entity structure

Strategy 3: Use Wyoming or Other DAO-Friendly Structures

Wyoming DAO LLC:

• Formally register as DAO LLC under Wyoming statute
• Establish clear employment vs. contractor policies
• Use legal entity for banking, payroll processing, tax compliance
• Obtain EIN, set up payroll infrastructure

Benefits:

• Legal recognition and limited liability
• Clear entity for tax and compliance purposes
• Access to traditional payroll and benefits providers

Tennessee and Utah: Also offer DAO LLC structures

Strategy 4: Voluntary Classification Settlement Program

If you've already misclassified workers and want to correct it:

IRS VCSP (Voluntary Classification Settlement Program):

• Pay just 10% of employment tax liability for most recent year
• No interest or penalties
• No audit of prior years for reclassified workers
• Must file Form 8952 to apply

Eligibility:

• Consistently treated workers as contractors
• Filed all required 1099s
• Not currently under IRS audit

When to Use: Before IRS discovers misclassification, or when DAO proactively identifies classification errors.

Strategy 5: Regular Classification Audits

Annual Review Process:

• Re-evaluate all contributor relationships against IRS and state tests
• Document any changes in relationship (scope, control, integration)
• Reclassify if factors shift toward employment
• Update agreements to reflect current relationship

Trigger Events for Re-evaluation:

• Relationship extends beyond initial term
• Contributor scope expands to core operations
• DAO begins controlling methods, not just results
• Contributor stops serving other clients
• Compensation changes to regular salary model

Conclusion: Classification Is Risk Management

DAO contributor classification isn't just a tax compliance exercise—it's a core risk management function. The financial exposure from misclassification can be devastating: back taxes, penalties, interest, state labor law violations, and potential personal liability for unpaid obligations.

Key Takeaways:

1. Apply Tests Rigorously: Use the IRS common law test for federal purposes and state-specific tests (like California's ABC test) for state compliance. When in conflict, comply with the stricter standard.

2. Account for Real Costs: Employee classification adds 10-15% in payroll taxes alone, plus benefits, insurance, and administrative overhead. Budget accordingly.

3. Token Compensation Adds Complexity: IRC § 83 governs token grants—plan for vesting taxation, consider 83(b) elections, and solve for withholding obligations on illiquid tokens.

4. Document Everything: IRS and state auditors expect documented classification decisions. "We thought they were contractors" isn't a defense—show your analysis and factors.

5. Foreign Contributors Aren't Exempt: W-8BEN forms, U.S. sourcing analysis, and potential withholding obligations apply. Failing to obtain W-8BEN creates backup withholding liability.

6. State Law Matters: California's ABC test makes most core contributors employees regardless of how independently they work. Multi-state DAOs face a patchwork of classification standards and withholding rules.

Need DAO Compliance Guidance?

Astraea Counsel helps DAOs design compliant contributor classification frameworks, structure token compensation, and implement employment tax compliance. We minimize tax and legal risk while preserving DAO flexibility. Explore our Regulatory Compliance services.

Related Resources

• Crypto Tax Lawyer's Guide - Tax compliance framework for crypto
• DAO Liability After Lido - Legal entity structures for DAOs
• DeFi Protocol Legal Structure - Entity comparison for protocols
• DAO LLC Formation Guide - Entity formation process
• DAO Token Launch Checklist - Token compensation structures
• Treasury Management for Crypto Companies - Token and stablecoin reserves
• Contact Us - Discuss your contributor classification needs

---

7. Seek Legal Counsel Early: Classification analysis is fact-intensive and jurisdiction-specific. Engage counsel before setting up contributor relationships, not after receiving an IRS notice.

The decentralized, global, token-based nature of DAO operations doesn't exempt them from employment and tax law. By understanding classification tests, structuring relationships appropriately, and implementing robust compliance processes, DAOs can compensate contributors while managing legal and financial risk.

---

About the Author

Chanté Eliaszadeh represents crypto, AI, and fintech startups on regulatory compliance, corporate transactions, and strategic matters. She advises DAOs on contributor classification, token compensation structures, and employment tax compliance, helping organizations design compliant frameworks that minimize legal and tax risk.

For guidance on your DAO's contributor classification and compensation structure, contact Astraea Counsel APC.

---

Disclaimer: This article provides general information only and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Contributor classification is fact-specific and varies by jurisdiction. Consult qualified legal and tax counsel for advice on your specific situation.