ASTRÆA COUNSEL
  • Home
    • Team
    • How We Work
    • Speaking
    • Press & Recognition
    • Results & Case Studies
    • Pricing
    • Litigation & Disputes
    • Business Partner Disputes
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Crypto Litigation
    • SEC Enforcement Defense

    • Crypto & Digital Assets
    • AI & Emerging Tech
    • DAOs
    • Fund Formation

    • Browse All Practice Areas
  • Insights
  • Contact
(310) 800-1780Book a Call

ASTRAEA COUNSEL

Trial and regulatory counsel for high-stakes disputes and digital-asset, fintech, and AI companies.

info@astraea.law

(310) 800-1780

Beverly Hills, CA

Practice Areas

  • Digital Assets & Blockchain
  • Litigation & Disputes
  • Artificial Intelligence & Emerging Tech
  • Securities Enforcement & Investigations
  • Fintech & Payments
  • Corporate & Transactions
  • Regulatory Compliance

Litigation

  • Litigation & Disputes
  • Business Partner Disputes
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Crypto Litigation
  • SEC Enforcement Defense
  • Results & Case Studies

Resources

  • Latest Insights
  • Token Classifier
  • GENIUS Act Compliance Clock
  • Our Team
  • Press & Recognition
  • Contact

The Firm

  • DAO & Governance
  • How We Work
  • Pricing
  • Speaking

© 2026 Astraea Counsel, APC. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyTerms of Use

Attorney Advertising. Attorney Advertising. The material on this website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by accessing or using this website. Any result portrayed on this website was dependent on the facts of that case, and the results will differ if based on different facts. Astraea Counsel, APC is a California Professional Corporation. Chanté Eliaszadeh (State Bar No. 335803) and Brandon Orewyler (State Bar No. 324391) are licensed to practice law in California only. The firm is not certified by the State Bar of California as a specialist in any field.

This site uses Google Analytics to improve user experience. See our for details.Privacy Policy for details.

  1. Home/
  2. Services/
  3. DAO Formation & Governance

DAO Lawyers for Formation, Governance, and Token Compliance

Decentralized does not mean unstructured. We help DAOs build legal foundations that protect contributors, satisfy regulators, and enable genuine community governance—from initial entity formation through mature protocol operations. Our California-based team brings both transactional structuring and litigation experience to DAO legal design.

Schedule a ConsultationView All Practice Areas

What We Do

End-to-end legal support for decentralized organizations, from first entity filing through ongoing governance operations.

DAO Entity Formation

  • Jurisdiction selection and entity structure analysis (LLC, UNA, foundation)
  • Operating agreement drafting with on-chain governance integration
  • Multi-entity wrapper structures for protocol liability isolation
  • State-specific DAO LLC formation (Wyoming, Tennessee, Utah, Marshall Islands)

Governance Framework Design

  • Voting mechanism design and quorum structure optimization
  • Delegation frameworks and representative governance models
  • Treasury management policies and multisig authorization protocols
  • Dispute resolution mechanisms and off-chain arbitration clauses

Token Distribution Compliance

  • Governance token classification and securities analysis
  • Airdrop structuring to minimize securities law exposure
  • Vesting schedules and lockup provisions for insider distributions
  • Cross-border distribution compliance and restricted jurisdiction mapping

Why DAOs Choose Us

Litigation + Transactional Expertise

Most DAO counsel handles either the transactional formation or the disputes that follow—not both. Our team brings litigation experience to the formation table, designing governance structures that hold up under real adversarial pressure, not just theoretical scenarios.

Real Crypto Bankruptcy Experience

We have guided clients through crypto insolvency proceedings and asset recovery actions. That experience shapes how we structure DAOs—with creditor protections, liability shields, and wind-down provisions that matter when things go wrong, not just when things go right.

Practical Governance Solutions

Decentralization is a spectrum, not a switch. We help DAOs find the right point on that spectrum for their stage, regulatory posture, and community—building governance that actually functions, with clear escalation paths and accountability mechanisms.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best legal structure for a DAO?

The optimal structure depends on the DAO's purpose, treasury size, token distribution, and regulatory exposure. Common options include Wyoming DAO LLCs (member-managed with on-chain governance), Cayman foundations (for protocol-level operations), UNA structures (for informal DAOs), and multi-entity wrappers that isolate protocol operations from treasury management. Each has different tax, liability, and governance implications. There is no one-size-fits-all answer—the right structure requires analyzing your specific DAO's operations and risk profile.

Can DAO members be personally liable for the DAO's actions?

Without proper legal structure, the risk is real — though the law is less settled than the headlines suggest. In the CFTC's Ooki DAO action, a federal court in California treated the DAO as an unincorporated association that could be sued and entered judgment against it, but the DAO never appeared to defend and the judgment came by default. In the Lido DAO litigation, the same district allowed claims to proceed past the pleading stage on the theory that the DAO operated as a general partnership and that certain institutional token holders were general partners — a ruling on the sufficiency of allegations, not a finding of liability after trial. Neither is binding appellate precedent. What both confirm is the exposure: when no entity is formed, the general-partnership default is the theory plaintiffs and regulators reach for, and general partners carry unlimited personal liability. Proper entity formation (LLC, foundation, or wrapper structure) is how members get limited liability instead, and the specific protections depend on jurisdiction and entity type.

Is a DAO governance token a security?

It depends on the token's economic rights and how it was distributed. A pure governance token that only controls protocol parameters (voting on upgrades, parameter changes) generally has a stronger argument against securities classification. But governance tokens that also distribute treasury revenue, protocol fees, or staking yields blur the line significantly. Under the March 2026 SEC/CFTC taxonomy, the analysis turns on whether holders have an expectation of profits derived from the efforts of others—and how the token was marketed matters as much as what it does.

What states allow DAO LLC formation?

Wyoming was the first state to enact DAO-specific LLC legislation (2021), followed by Tennessee, Utah, and Vermont with various approaches. The Marshall Islands offers an international option with its DAO LLC framework. Each jurisdiction has different requirements for smart contract governance integration, member voting thresholds, and regulatory obligations. Wyoming remains the most established option with the most legal precedent, but the right jurisdiction depends on your DAO's specific operations, token structure, and international member base.

Insights on DAO Law

Case Study

DAO Liability After Lido: What the Court Actually Held and Why You Need a Legal Wrapper

Read Article →
Thought Leadership

DeFi Protocol Legal Structure: LLC, Foundation, or Unincorporated DAO?

Read Article →
Client Guide

DAO LLC Formation Guide: Step-by-Step Wyoming DUNA Setup

Read Article →

Schedule a DAO Structure Consultation

Book a 30-minute call to discuss your DAO's entity structure, governance design, and compliance requirements.

1
Date & Time
2
Details
3
Confirmed

Pick a date and time

Build Governance That Lasts

Your DAO deserves legal structure designed for both decentralization and durability.

Talk to an Attorney