ASTRÆA COUNSEL
  • Home
    • Team
    • How We Work
    • Speaking
    • Press & Recognition
    • Results & Case Studies
    • Pricing
    • Litigation & Disputes
    • Business Partner Disputes
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Crypto Litigation
    • SEC Enforcement Defense

    • Crypto & Digital Assets
    • AI & Emerging Tech
    • DAOs
    • Fund Formation

    • Browse All Practice Areas
  • Insights
  • Contact
(310) 800-1780Book a Call

ASTRAEA COUNSEL

Trial and regulatory counsel for high-stakes disputes and digital-asset, fintech, and AI companies.

info@astraea.law

(310) 800-1780

Beverly Hills, CA

Practice Areas

  • Digital Assets & Blockchain
  • Litigation & Disputes
  • Artificial Intelligence & Emerging Tech
  • Securities Enforcement & Investigations
  • Fintech & Payments
  • Corporate & Transactions
  • Regulatory Compliance

Litigation

  • Litigation & Disputes
  • Business Partner Disputes
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Crypto Litigation
  • SEC Enforcement Defense
  • Results & Case Studies

Resources

  • Latest Insights
  • Token Classifier
  • GENIUS Act Compliance Clock
  • Our Team
  • Press & Recognition
  • Contact

The Firm

  • DAO & Governance
  • How We Work
  • Pricing
  • Speaking

© 2026 Astraea Counsel, APC. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyTerms of Use

Attorney Advertising. Attorney Advertising. The material on this website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by accessing or using this website. Any result portrayed on this website was dependent on the facts of that case, and the results will differ if based on different facts. Astraea Counsel, APC is a California Professional Corporation. Chanté Eliaszadeh (State Bar No. 335803) and Brandon Orewyler (State Bar No. 324391) are licensed to practice law in California only. The firm is not certified by the State Bar of California as a specialist in any field.

This site uses Google Analytics to improve user experience. See our for details.Privacy Policy for details.

  1. Home/
  2. Insights/
  3. Ninth Circuit

Ninth Circuit

3 articles

Thought Leadership

Can a California Court Reach the Company Behind an AI Agent?

An AI agent transacts with a Californian and something goes wrong. The agent is not a legal person, so the defendant has to be the company that deployed it—and that company may sit anywhere. After Briskin and Gelasio, the borderless-internet defense is gone in the Ninth Circuit. Here is how the express-aiming test applies when the thing doing the aiming chose its own counterparty.

August 21, 2026 · 8 min readRead More →
Legal Update

The Borderless-Internet Defense Just Died in the Ninth Circuit

For twenty years, online operators beat lawsuits by insisting the internet is everywhere and nowhere. Briskin v. Shopify ended that in the Ninth Circuit, Gelasio v. Zafar showed it reaches a foreign NFT operation that took a Californian's money, and in May 2026 the Supreme Court declined an invitation to intervene. Here is what changed, how far it reaches, and the seam that is still open.

July 20, 2026 · 15 min readRead More →
Client Guide

How to Sue an Offshore, Foreign, or Anonymous Defendant in California

Foreign incorporation and offshore residence no longer put an internet operator beyond California's reach. A step-by-step guide to jurisdiction, service, and anonymous defendants, from the attorney who argued Gelasio v. Zafar in the Ninth Circuit.

July 20, 2026 · 11 min readRead More →
View All Articles

Need Legal Guidance for Your Digital Asset Business?

Get practical legal counsel from attorneys who understand both the technology and the regulatory landscape.

Talk to an Attorney