ASTRÆA COUNSEL
  • Home
    • Team
    • How We Work
    • Speaking
    • Press & Recognition
    • Results & Case Studies
    • Pricing
    • Litigation & Disputes
    • Business Partner Disputes
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Crypto Litigation
    • SEC Enforcement Defense

    • Crypto & Digital Assets
    • AI & Emerging Tech
    • DAOs
    • Fund Formation

    • Browse All Practice Areas
  • Insights
  • Contact
(310) 800-1780Book a Call

ASTRAEA COUNSEL

Trial and regulatory counsel for high-stakes disputes and digital-asset, fintech, and AI companies.

info@astraea.law

(310) 800-1780

Beverly Hills, CA

Practice Areas

  • Digital Assets & Blockchain
  • Litigation & Disputes
  • Artificial Intelligence & Emerging Tech
  • Securities Enforcement & Investigations
  • Fintech & Payments
  • Corporate & Transactions
  • Regulatory Compliance

Litigation

  • Litigation & Disputes
  • Business Partner Disputes
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Crypto Litigation
  • SEC Enforcement Defense
  • Results & Case Studies

Resources

  • Latest Insights
  • Token Classifier
  • GENIUS Act Compliance Clock
  • Our Team
  • Press & Recognition
  • Contact

The Firm

  • DAO & Governance
  • How We Work
  • Pricing
  • Speaking

© 2026 Astraea Counsel, APC. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyTerms of Use

Attorney Advertising. Attorney Advertising. The material on this website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by accessing or using this website. Any result portrayed on this website was dependent on the facts of that case, and the results will differ if based on different facts. Astraea Counsel, APC is a California Professional Corporation. Chanté Eliaszadeh (State Bar No. 335803) and Brandon Orewyler (State Bar No. 324391) are licensed to practice law in California only. The firm is not certified by the State Bar of California as a specialist in any field.

This site uses Google Analytics to improve user experience. See our for details.Privacy Policy for details.

  1. Home/
  2. Insights/
  3. AI Governance

AI Governance

4 articles

Client Guide

Vibe Coding and Copyright: Who Owns Your AI-Generated Codebase?

Purely AI-generated code has no human author, and copyright law will not protect it. A technology-transactions attorney maps what a vibe-coded company actually owns, where the gap surfaces first (the diligence table, not the courtroom), and the provenance, policy, and contract fixes to put in place now.

August 31, 2026 · 12 min readRead More →
Thought Leadership

The Caremark Duty in the Managed Agents Era: A Board-Level AI Governance Framework

Delaware Chancery does not care how fast your team shipped the agent. It cares whether the board knew what the agent was doing. A Caremark analysis of board oversight duties for AI agent deployment, with case law, D&O insurance analysis, and a compliance checklist.

April 22, 2026 · 24 min readRead More →
Thought Leadership

What Claude Managed Agents Means for Your Compliance Stack: A KYA Framework Analysis

Anthropic's Managed Agents runtime shipped on April 8. A former SEC Honors Program intern in the SEC's Cyber Unit maps each product feature to the KYA Five Pillars governance framework—and identifies the compliance gaps deployers must close before their first production session.

April 12, 2026 · 22 min readRead More →
Thought Leadership

Not an Agent. Not a Defense: Seven Doctrines That Already Hold AI Deployers Liable

The technology industry calls them agents. The law calls them tools. Seven existing legal doctrines—from board oversight to products liability to trade secret exposure—already impose direct liability on companies deploying AI agents, without the defenses that agency law would provide.

March 18, 2026 · 48 min readRead More →
View All Articles

Deploying AI Agents or Building an AI Product?

Agent liability, governance frameworks, vendor contracts, and the state and EU rules that already apply — mapped to what you are actually shipping.

Talk to an Attorney